|
Eco Investor September 2015
International Shares
Turnaround Leads to All Time High
In August the unit price for Australian Ethical's International Share
Fund hit an all time high of $1.067. While this is commendable, also noteworthy
has been the huge turnaround in the unit price since the Global Financial
Crisis when the $1 units were at an all time low of $0.51 in late 2011
and again in mid 2012.
To find out about the turnaround, Eco Investor asked the Fund's portfolio
manager, Nathan Lim, who took over management of the Fund at this time,
in August 2011.
Eco Investor: What were the drivers of the recovery in the Fund's
unit price, a recovery in cleantech shares after the GFC, the overseas
political and investment climate for clean tech, stock selection, something
else or a combination?
Nathan
Lim: I am a bit embarrassed to mention this factor and will be the first
person to admit there was an element of luck in it, but I took over management
of the fund in August 2011. If you feel it is important to mention that
as a factor, I will let you decide whether to include it in the article.
Certainly post the GFC, cleantech and renewable energy stocks have enjoyed
a period of strong returns, but it was not immediate. The market, as represented
by the MSCI World Index, reached its absolute low in March 2009. Cleantech
and renewable energy stocks did not reach their low until mid to late
2012. Just as policy support was being withdrawn in the period immediately
after the crisis, policy support returned only after the bottom was well
and truly in.
At the time, we liken the situation to Maslow's hierarchy of needs. With
unemployment skyrocketing and people struggling to get by, the policy
focus was on getting people back to work and providing financial relief.
Rightfully or not, many environmental policies were deemed unimportant
in the face of the collapsing economy and unsurprisingly were slashed.
Good examples of this occurred in Italy and Spain. However, once the
panic was over, attention returned to the environment and policy support
re-emerged. The Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster in March 2011 added
to the policy push as nuclear power was no longer going to be the carbon-free
solution to climate change. A new energy mix had to emerge.
Besides the return of policy support, the cost of renewable energy, solar
in particular, collapsed. This lay the foundations for a return to profitability
for the renewable energy sector as surviving companies saw rising orders,
expanding margins and balance sheet repair.
Eco Investor: Which sectors are leading the way and which sectors
are lagging?
Nathan Lim: Since bottoming in 2012, our best-performing sectors have
been wind, geothermal and energy efficiency. Energy infrastructure companies
(think poles and wires) have lagged as their defensive qualities worked
against them in a rising market. Recycling stocks have also underperformed
as the underlying commodity prices that support their business models
have continued to fall.
Eco Investor: Is geography an issue? How do the US, Europe and Asia
compare for cleantech stocks?
Nathan Lim: Geography is a big issue. From a renewable energy perspective,
China is one market, and the rest of the world is another market. Chinese
manufacturers dominate the China market. The rest of the world has a mix
of players from different countries. From an investor's point of view,
this is your first question: Do you want to invest in China or not?
We have for the most part stayed away from China, but recently added
two investments with significant Chinese exposure: JA Solar and Goldwind.
Eco Investor: What is the Fund's policy on distributions? Is a distribution
in sight for the Fund? If so, what is the likely time frame?
Nathan Lim: As you noted earlier, we only just recovered to our original
issue price of $1, so we still have a lot of losses to work off. We will
review our distribution policy once it is appropriate but suspect that
will not be for some time yet.
Eco Investor: Do you have any other comments on international clean
energy, politics, innovation, funds management, the Fund, or cleantech
in Australia?
Nathan Lim: The biggest frustration we have at the moment is the positive
correlation between the oil price and renewable energy stocks. We believe
oil and natural gas prices have little bearing on renewable energy as
we are seeing companies bidding on power purchase agreements (PPAs) at
prices below what a new build natural gas or coal-fired power station
can deliver. We have endured much pain in solar stocks this past year
but remain confident in the solar/ renewable energy industry in the long
term.
Detractors are also highlighting the impending expiration of the US Investment
Tax Credit (ITC). In previous policy cycles, the expiration of major US
policy initiatives did indeed lead to poor industry conditions. The boom/
bust cycle in the wind industry created by the Production Tax Credit is
a good example.
We believe circumstances for the industry are different this time. Whereas
previously the renewable energy market was dominated by the US and Europe,
there are now many more countries in the world that are joining the "gigawatt
class". For example, Brazil installed 2.4 gigawatts of wind last
year, about half of what the US installed. Japan was the second largest
market for solar in 2014 with 9.7 gigawatts, passing Europe and the US
at 7 and 6.2 gigawatts respectively.
The point is renewables have gone mainstream and are increasingly cost
competitive. The expiration of the ITC will undoubtedly have an impact
on US sales, but the industry does not solely revolve around this market
anymore.
|