Eco Investor November 2017
Features
Renewable Energy and Environmentally Positive Investments on the ASX
By Victor Bivell
This is an edited text of a talk given at Ethical Investment Week
in Brisbane on 10 October, 2017
Thanks to everyone for coming along tonight, and to Louise and Terry
from Ethical Investment Advisers for the invitation speak. I'm very happy
to do what I can for the ethical investment industry. My talk is on Renewable
Energy and Environmentally Positive Investments on the ASX. Before I start,
can I get a feel for your interest? How many people here are investors
in managed share funds? A few. And how many hold share investments directly
- in your own name? Most of you. Thanks. That's helpful.
I'm a small investor as well as a journalist and I've been interested
in environmentally positive investments since about 1990. In 2005 I started
a monthly magazine called Eco Investor and I've now published 110 editions.
These are also in an online searchable Database which has over 5,000 stories
and 2.6 million words, and the website has over 1,000 free stories. The
people who read the magazine are retail and high net worth investors,
financial advisers, small fund managers and the managing directors of
cleantech companies. Those I've met are all very committed to environmental
investment and would be at the deep green end of the spectrum.
What do we offer these people? The key things are independent journalism,
a method to identify cleantech investments so they are getting the real
thing, and a way to help manage risk because on the stock market it can
be ridiculously easy to do your dough.
On independent journalism - I am not a financial adviser, so please don't
take anything I say tonight as financial advice. It's not. I'm an independent
journalist. I am not beholden to anyone. I do my own research, I make
up my own mind, and I write what I think is right. Most people in the
finance industry are trying to sell you something, a product or service.
Yes, I have something to sell, which is a magazine subscription, but at
$95 it's really not here or there. Most people in the finance industry
are good people, but some are not. The only advice I would give tonight
is that if you use financial products or services, make sure you understand
enough about them to be able to give the final yes or no decision with
confidence. Outsource the knowledge, outsource the research, outsource
the experience, but never outsource the final yes or no decision.
My approach is to help investors to add and manage an environmental theme
to their share or investment portfolio. Cleantech is a theme, like banks,
like mining, like healthcare. For most people, the best approach is to
see cleantech as part of a balanced portfolio. That means using asset
allocation for income and capital gains. And it means diversification.
So by all means invest in the shares that suit you and you are comfortable
with - be they banks, property trusts, telecoms, ethical shares, etc,
and, if you want, alongside those allocate a percentage to environmental
shares. 10 or 20 per cent is a conservative start.
The next step is to identify environmental investments. There are over
2,200 companies on the ASX. How do you tell the cleantechs? To do that
I devised a method, an environmentally positive screen. This has three
criteria: the core business activity must be a solution to an environmental
problem; the environmental activity should be at least 50 per cent of
the company's business; and I like to see that the company and directors
have a commitment to being an environmentally positive business.
The sort of business activities that pass this screen include: renewable
energy and energy efficiency, waste management and recycling, sustainable
food, sustainable housing, environmental engineering and many other clean
technologies. I'll talk about these later.
How many of these 2,200 ASX companies meet these criteria? At present,
about 95. That's nearly 5 per cent and it's not a bad number. We also
follow four unlisted managed funds and one unlisted investment company
which pass this screen. So in terms of unlisted financial products, there
is a lot of room for improvement.
Having got our 95 stocks, the next step I apply is a Portfolio Status
to help sort the shares based on their risk/ return profile. Core Securities
are stocks that have a track record of profits and dividends. In my view,
if a share doesn't pay a dividend, it is speculative. We sort the speculative
into Pre-Dividend Securities: companies that are profitable but don't
yet pay a dividend; Pre-Profit Securities where companies have revenue
but are not yet profitable; and Pre-Revenue Securities which are early
stage companies that are still developing their product or service and
don't have sales. There are currently 26 environmental stocks that pay
dividends. 11 are Pre-Dividend, 27 are Pre-Profit, and 31 are Pre-Revenue.
The Portfolio Status Strategy allows investors to identify the securities
that match their risk and return profile. I don't give advice, but I am
happy to caution that most investors should be focused on the Core Securities.
I see the Core Securities as a mini universe of stocks that you can research
and from which you can pick your investments. You can still make mistakes
there, but if you do your losses are likely to be smaller than with the
speculative stocks, especially the pre-revenue and pre-profit stocks,
which are really venture capital. If you are not an experienced share
market investor with money you can afford to lose, I would leave the speculative
investments to those who are and can. From experience, I can say that
have I often done my dough on pre-revenue and pre-profit shares, but with
the core securities I do OK.
Having got our 95 stocks, I also analyze them by industry sectors. Cleantech
is not a separate sector like insurance or gold mining or healthcare.
Instead, cleantech can intersect with all other industry sectors as other
industries have their environmental problems. It is closest to healthcare
in the sense that it is about the health of the Earth, but because the
Earth is so large there are a huge number of environmental problems. Some
are at the global level like climate change. Others are very local like
say a pollution spill at a river. In between, there are many countries,
regions and industries with environmental problems that need solutions.
We need to be realistic about the solutions that investment can provide.
Some environmental problems need political solutions. Some need financial
help. Some need consumer action. Some need community organization and
local elbow grease. Some need a product or a service, which may or may
not exist; and if it does exist it may be provided by either a community
organization or an unlisted business. If it is offered by a listed business,
the business may be on an overseas stock exchange. So we have to be realistic.
In the scheme of things the number of solutions offered by companies listed
on the ASX is far from comprehensive. But despite this, it is still very
impressive with a good range of activities including some critical issues
and solutions. The number of renewable energy related stocks is growing
strongly. Waste management and recycling are well established. Sustainable
food is represented with aquaculture and organic food. Water management
is growing. There is some eco-tourism, and recently we've seen the first
listed company in the share economy. So the range of industries is good
and growing.
Renewable Energy
Let's have a closer look at the renewable energy sector on the ASX. There
are 56 companies which have some sort of clean energy angle to their business,
including those for which it is not the main game.
The slide shows the renewable energy developers and generators. As you
can see, there is a good range of technologies: solar energy technology
developers and project developers, wind energy, geothermal, wave and hydro.
Biofuels is not strong but I've put it there for completeness.
Solar is now slowly growing but it had a shaky start and is still not
as strong as it is in the real world. Among the technology developers,
Greatcell is the old Dyesol which is commercializing a world leading perovskite
technology for built-in photovoltaics on windows and steel roofing. The
rest are iffy. Quantum Energy developed solar hot water heat pumps about
30 years ago but that is now only a small part of its business, which
is mostly healthcare. The other two companies are very minor.
The solar project developers are new to the area but they are growing
and have good projects underway. Genex is building a solar farm in north
Queensland, Carnegie is building a solar farm at Northam just outside
of Perth, Tag Pacific has built several solar projects for clients, and
ReNu Energy is building a portfolio of commercial solar projects on shopping
centres and it already has one at a school. The sector is worth keeping
an eye on. The exception is AFT Corporation which seems to be going nowhere.
Wind energy is strong with three big project developers. Geothermal and
hydro power are strong thanks to the three big New Zealand utilities:
Contact Energy, Mercury NZ and Meridian Energy. Genex plans to add hydro
energy storage to its solar farm.
The standout in wave energy is Carnegie Clean Energy, which is currently
the world's leading wave energy technology developer.
There are also energy efficiency, energy storage and waste to energy
businesses. There are plenty of energy efficiency stocks with a good range
of business activities. Beacon is a retailer of lighting, LEDs and fans.
Gale Pacific has a big variety of modern sunshades. Metro Performance
Glass makes double glazed windows and windows with insulating glass. BluGlass
is commercializing a high-tech way to improve LEDs and semi-conductors.
Altech Chemicals wants to produce high purity alumina for synthetic sapphires
that are used in LEDs and semiconductors. Energy Action offers energy
efficiency services to business. I won't go through all the companies,
but the key point here is that there are a lot of interesting products
and services in the market or under development.
There are a few wannabe battery makers but so far only one is actually
making batteries. That's Redflow, which has developed a zinc bromide flow
battery and is now at the stage of early mass production and trying to
ramp up sales.
There is also some action in the waste to energy sector. The biggest
is Cleanaway Waste Management, which many of us would know as the collector
of council rubbish every week. It makes energy from landfill gas and food
and organic waste. But it is a big company and these are a small part
of its business.
The other area where the ASX is strong is in mining resources for batteries
and energy efficiency. In recent years there has been a boom in companies
that are exploring for and mining to produce rare earths, lithium, cobalt,
graphite, vanadium, scandium and high purity alumina. Rare earths are
used in rechargeable batteries and in magnets for electric cars and wind
turbines. Lithium, graphite and cobalt are used in batteries for electric
cars and energy storage systems, so demand for these is rising and is
expected to keep rising for the foreseeable future. Vanadium can be used
to make vanadium flow batteries. And scandium can be used in metal alloys
to reduce their weight and increase their strength, so it is seen to have
a future role improving energy efficiency in airplanes and cars.
Without going into detail about all the companies, I hope I've given
you a feel for the great variety of renewable energy companies on the
ASX and how promising the future looks. But there is a problem. Here are
the 56 companies by their portfolio status. Who can see the problem?

31 of the companies, over half, are pre-revenue. They are still developing
their products and have no sales. Another 14 are pre-profit, so they have
some sales but don't make that all important profit. Only eight companies
are profitable and pay a dividend, and of those only seven are majority
energy businesses. Only four are energy generators and only one is an
Australian generator. So the renewable energy sector on the ASX is still
immature. The graph clearly shows that what investors need is more renewable
energy companies that are profitable and pay a dividend.
The good news is that most of the eight companies are very good ones.
So small retail investors who are looking at only a few investments in
the sector can do well.

In contrast to renewable energy, the graph with the risk profile of all
of the 95 environmental investments shows a much better spread with 26
companies paying dividends. This is what we want to see - plenty of small
innovative companies coming in at the pre-revenue end, working their way
up the commercialization curve, and plenty of larger, more mature dividend
paying stocks at the top end. So the environmental investment sector,
overall, is looking heathy.
I'll now focus on these core securities.
It's great to see nearly half the securities are in the top 100, top
200 or top 300 Indices. The other half are emerging companies that overall
have good growth prospects and are traveling well. The ones in blue, Contact,
Mercury and Meridian are the three New Zealand renewable energy generators
which are actually large enough to be in the top 300 but are not included
because they are dual listed and their main base is the New Zealand Stock
Exchange. Quintis is in blue because its shares are currently suspended
while it is in discussions about a recapitalization and possible change
of control.
Industry Sectors
The core stocks cover a good range of industry sectors, with exposure
to quite a few different parts of the economy. Waste management, as I've
mentioned, is very well established. Cleanaway is Australia's biggest
waste management company. Beside municipal waste it handles a huge variety
and quantity of industrial and commercial wastes and is an active recycler.
It has a lot of fingers in a lot of markets and it recently won a contract
to handle waste from Coles' supermarkets and other shops around Australia,
so it's getting bigger. Sims Metal Management is an even bigger success
story as it is the world's biggest metals recycler and has a growing business
recycling electronic waste. There is a huge percentage of ewaste in the
world that is still not recycled. Toxfree Solutions is a fast growing
company that handles mining and industrial waste and it recently bought
a major medical waste business. Medical waste is a serious waste as it
can involve disease, and the last thing you want is people walking down
the street and finding an appendix hanging out of the bin.
Sustainable housing and ecotourism both have a lot of room to grow. Two
companies offer what is the closest many people will get to nature tourism.
These are the old caravan parks which today have been reinvented as modern
holiday parks. They are often on a beach, river, in a forest or close
to a national park. So people can get to enjoy nature and develop their
love for it. The two companies here are Ingenia Communities Group and
Aspen Group. The holiday parks also have permanent accommodation, and
this is being transformed with what are called manufactured homes. These
are houses made in a factory and transported onsite. They have several
environmental advantages. They have a low carbon footprint compared to
brick and concrete houses. They can be outfitted with the latest energy
and water saving technologies. And being of light construction they can
be moved around and more easily recycled. They also offer social advantages
as affordable housing, and allow retirees to downsize to free up capital
and to live in a supportive community.


Another sector with a lot happening is aquaculture. Growing enough sustainable
food to feed the world is a huge problem. As you know, a lot of agriculture
involves massive land clearing and chemical inputs. In the oceans it is
easy to overfish and bring some species close to extinction. One answer
for overfishing is aquaculture. Aquaculture has had a mixed history on
the ASX but it now seems to be getting its act together. But there is
a lot of room to grow. Tassal and Huon both grow Atlantic salmon, and
New Zealand King Salmon grows king salmon. So it helps if you like salmon.
I wasn't going to mention chemical replacements, but it's now topical
thanks to the ABC. Who saw the Four Corners program last night? It was
excellent. It started at Tindal Airforce Base in the Northern Territory
where for many years the airforce used a fire fighting foam that was carcinogenic
and which seeped into the groundwater and river. The people have been
drinking this water. It was very sad. One couple living on what looks
like an idyllic rural property found out that they have been feeding their
children with poison water for their entire lives. Another affected family
on the program is at Oakey, which is near Brisbane. This issue now affects
over 70 towns around Australia.
Very near where I live in Sydney there is a sign saying do not eat the
fish. This is because two bays away on the river at Homebush they made
agent orange during the Vietnam War. Another problem is that the pharmaceuticals
we take can sometimes get into our waterways, and this is also happening
at Sydney Harbour. So industrial, military, pharmaceutical and agricultural
chemicals can significantly and seriously increase the chemical load in
the environmental. The search is on for non toxic replacements for these.
Two companies that help are Blackmores and Kathmandu. Chemical replacement
is not their main business, but both are very environmentally aware. They
do good work in this area and they are the best we have so far on the
ASX. Blackmores is a health company, but I include it because it offers
a way to help reduce the use of some pharmaceuticals. Complementary medicine
has its critics, but there are doctors who suggested some of their products.
The point is that Blackmores offers a way that is worth exploring and
may help with the problem. Kathmandu is very aware of this environmental
issue. As an outdoor clothing maker and retailer, it is active in looking
for and using alternatives to fabrics that require chemical and pesticide
inputs.
Market Data
Looking at market capitalization, we can see that a good number of the
core securities are large businesses. Most of these are large enough to
attract institutional investors, which is good for everyone. If being
in the S&P/ ASX 300 Index was on market cap alone, almost all of these
companies would be in. You'll notice, as I mentioned earlier, the New
Zealand utilities are among the large stocks, as are Sims Metal Management
and Cleanaway Waste Management. Qube Holdings manages a number of the
major import-export ports around Australia. Its main environmental activity
is that it does a lot of freight movement by rail, and is building the
Moorebank Intermodal Freight Terminal in Sydney. When it's finished this
will rail freight to and from the Port of Sydney and they say will take
about 3,000 heavy truck movements a day off the streets of Sydney and
more between regional and interstate centres.
The chart on profitability gives a three year profit history on each
stock. While there are some good steady performers, there are also some
big movements both up and own. The chart shows that environmental stocks
are just as volatile as other shares. For newer investors, it's a reminder
that shares are nothing like term deposits. The value of your capital
can jump around big time. If you want to invest, you really do need to
do your homework. Sims for example, had a big rise because it is now finally
recovering from a huge long slump around the time of the GFC. Likewise
for Cleanaway, which has spent years sorting out and recovering from high
debt. But, importantly, the chart shows that there are plenty of big profits
to be made while helping the environment.
The chart on dividends shows that there is a good income to be had from
environmental shares. The yields are very compatible with dividends in
other sectors, both in their size and their volatility. There are plenty
of franking credits for those who like them, and who doesn't? So if you
want to use environmental investments to get an income stream or supplement
your income, there are enough good companies and enough good dividends
to do that.
The final chart is on share prices and how they have traveled over the
past year. The main ASX index went sideways, and it looks like the same
happened with environmental shares. About the same number of shares that
went up went down. Most have moved in a narrow band - about half were
in single digits. Another six were less than 20 per cent. The big movers
were New Zealand King Salmon which beat its prospectus forecasts, Sims
Metal Management which has reduced its cost base and is enjoying the recovery
in iron ore prices, and Huon Aquaculture which paid a maiden dividend.
I'll finish there. I hope I've been able to share with you some of my
interest and enthusiasm for what are a great bunch of companies doing
some great things for investors and for the environment.